GE TELEPHONE POLL IN AUCKLAND AND NORTHLAND PENINSULA (COLMAR BRUNTON)

GE FREE NORTHLAND is putting out this alert to let you know that the Auckland Regional Council and most of the territorial authorities north of Auckland right up to Cape Reinga have carried out collaborative community consultation on Genetically Modified Organisms.

Colmar Brunton was commissioned to conduct a telephone survey during late July - mid August to get ratepayers and residents opinions on GMOs.

They will be asking in particular whether ratepayers are satisfied with current national regulation by central government agencies ERMA and MAF (under the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996) or whether people would like local councils to regulate GMOs in some way.

Survey participants who advocate regulation of GMO land use by local councils will further be asked their opinion on regulation of GMOs versus outright prohibition.

Engaging in this process is important because the results could be used to justify a pro-or anti-GE stance by councils in the North. We await the results!

GE FREE NORTHLAND strongly supports (in view of the incompetence of central government agencies like ERMA and MAF and the flaws and gaps in the HSNO Act) local regulation of GMO land use.

Our preference is for outright prohibition of all GMO land use and GMO aquaculture until such time as a truly strict liability regime is put in place, the risks are adequately identified and evaluated, credible systems for ensuring the protection of organic and conventional primary production, and genetic engineering shows some evidence of benefit overseas.

To date, GE crops have performed poorly (with a significant yield drag, despite promises of higher yields) and there are growing concerns about adverse impacts on the environment and on human and animal health.

This has always been a debate between those scientists who refuse to acknowledge the growing body of evidence showing that GE is not inherently safe or predictable, and those scientists who are sceptical of GE.

Please note that there will also be a submission process that you can participate in, but this will be after the telephone poll.


AI-generated Summary

GE Free Northland is alerting Auckland and Northland residents about a collaborative community consultation regarding Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs).
Colmar Brunton has been commissioned to conduct a telephone survey (late July - mid August 2009) to gauge public opinion on GMO regulation.
The survey will explore whether residents are satisfied with current national regulation by ERMA and MAF or prefer local council regulation,
potentially leading to a pro- or anti-GMO stance by Northland councils.
GE Free Northland strongly advocates for local regulation, ideally outright prohibition, due to concerns about
central government agencies' competency and flaws in the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act (HSNO Act).

They cite poor performance of GE crops, environmental concerns, and potential impacts on human and animal health.
A subsequent submission process will follow the telephone poll.

Entities and Relationships

Here's a breakdown of entities and the relationships between them.

Organizations:

  • GE Free Northland: Advocates for GMO prohibition, conducts outreach. Relationship: "is advocating for" - GMO prohibition; "is conducting" - outreach; "supports" - local regulation.
  • Auckland Regional Council: Conducting collaborative community consultation. Relationship: "collaborates with" - Territorial Authorities; "conducting" - consultation.
  • Territorial Authorities (North of Auckland to Cape Reinga): Participating in collaborative consultation. Relationship: "collaborates with" - Auckland Regional Council; "conducting" - consultation.
  • Colmar Brunton: Conducting telephone survey. Relationship: "commissioned by" - Auckland Regional Council and Territorial Authorities; "is conducting" - telephone survey.
  • ERMA (Environmental Risk Management Authority): National regulatory agency (part of government). Relationship: "regulates" - GMOs; "criticized by" - GE Free Northland.
  • MAF (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry): National regulatory agency (part of government). Relationship: "regulates" - GMOs; "criticized by" - GE Free Northland.

People/Roles:

  • Ratepayers & Residents (of Auckland & Northland): Survey participants. Relationship: "participates in" - telephone survey; "expresses opinion on" - GMO regulation.
  • Scientists (pro-GE): Dismiss or downplay evidence of GMO risks. Relationship: "opposes" - Scientists (anti-GE)
  • Scientists (anti-GE): Point to growing evidence of GMO risks. Relationship: "opposes" - Scientists (pro-GE)

Topics/Concepts:

  • GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms): Subject of the survey and debate. Relationship: "regulated by" - ERMA and MAF; "opposed by" - GE Free Northland; "debated by" - scientists.
  • HSNO Act (Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996): National legislation governing GMOs. Relationship: "flawed according to" - GE Free Northland.
  • Regulation: Focus of the survey, preferred by some. Relationship: "advocated for by" - GE Free Northland (local); "current system" - ERMA and MAF (national)
  • Prohibition: Preferred action by GE Free Northland. Relationship: "advocated for by" - GE Free Northland.
  • Primary Production: Potential impact from GMOs. Relationship: "threatened by" - potential adverse impacts of GMOs.

Previous Post Next Post